Former writer suing Vince McMahon and WWE over “offensively racist” scripts

A new lawsuit has been filed against Vince McMahon and WWE.

Britney Abrahams, who was a writer for WWE from 2020 to 2022, filed the lawsuit on Tuesday, April 25 against Vince McMahon and other WWE executives.

The lawsuit includes Stephanie McMahon, Chris Lubrando (SVP, Creative Writing Operations at WWE), WWE creative team members Chris Dunn, Ryan Callahan, Jen Pepperman, and former team member Mike Heller.

SmackDown Vice President Ryan Callahan, former writers Chris Dunn & Mike Heller, Vice President Christine Lubrano, and writer Jen Pepperman are also listed as defendants. 

Abrahams is suing over alleged racial and gender stereotypes in scripts and wrongful termination.

In the lawsuit, Abrahams alleges that she was discriminated against and fired for objecting to “offensively racist and stereotypical jargon” in scripts for black WWE talent. Abrahams further claims that her complaints were ignored.

Examples cited include the following:

-Bianca Belair saying “Uh-Uh! Don’t make me take off my earrings and beat your ass! ”

-Apollo Crews speaking with a “stereotypical and exaggerated Nigerian accent.”

-“Discriminatory pitches” for Reggie where he would be “hunted” by Shane Thorne

-Love triangle between Mansoor, Aliyah and Angel Garza, which included Mansoor’s secret being that he was behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Abrahams sent an email to Callahan regarding Belair’s scene, saying, “I know I’m new, I’m not trying to be disrespectful or step on [Dunn]’s or anyone’s toes, but I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that [Ms. Belair]’s scene includes racial jargon and offensive stereotypes, particularly her go-home line.”

The suit also alleges that Belair also objected to the line, telling Dunn, “3 DIFFERENT TIMES THAT I DON’T WANT TO SAY THAT LINE! BUT HE NEVER LISTENS TO ME! HE PUTS THAT LINE IN EVERY WEEK.” Belair is also alleged to have said the line would make her sound, “ghetto.” 

Abrahams alleges that she was fired by WWE for taking a commemorative WrestleMania 37 chair home. “WWE did not subject employees to disciplinary action in response to taking the removable, temporary seating, limited edition WrestleMania branded chairs, from the WrestleMania events.”

Abrahams was terminated by WWE back on April 7, 2022, alleging that “in retaliation for engaging in protected conduct Defendants unlawfully and pretextually terminated Plaintiff’s employment.”

Abrahams is seeking the following:

“An award of damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but in any event in excess of the jurisdictional limit of any other court which might otherwise have jurisdiction over this matter, plus prejudgment interest, to compensate Plaintiffs for all monetary and/or economic damages, including but not limited to, the loss of past and future income, wages, compensation, seniority, and other benefits of employment.”

As of this writing, no defendant has been served with the lawsuit. WWE has not publicly commented on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit states the following:

“It is clear that despite Plaintiff’s excellent work performance, Defendants actually terminated her employment based on her complaints about Defendants’ racial discrimination and due to her race and gender.

While Plaintiff’s employment with WWE was a harrowing, traumatic experience, the events complained of herein do not reflect a unique incident, as rudimentary internet research paints a similarly distressing picture of discriminatory abuse and misconduct by WWE and those occupying the most powerful positions within WWE.

The totality of these acts demonstrates a pattern of discrimination intentionally perpetrated by the WWE management and executive officers against Plaintiff.

For a considerable period following her termination Plaintiff was unable to locate permanent work due to Defendants’ discrimination and defamatory statements regarding her work performance.

Upon information and belief, Defendants devised, implemented, and executed a scheme through which they gave disparate, preferential treatment and superior benefits to male and white, Caucasian employees, while knowingly and intentionally denying equal treatment and benefits to female and black, African American employees, including Plaintiff.

Defendants discriminated against and terminated Plaintiff on the basis of her race, color, gender and because Plaintiff complained about and/or opposed the unlawful conduct of Defendants related to the above protected classes.”

Secondary sources: Fightful and F4WOnline

Total
0
Shares